is a wealthy dating site visited by 81,310 people/month.

These people visit 155,342 times/month at an average of 09:00 minutes/visit.

The majority are Male, 35-49 Years Old, Caucasian with a College Education and a Household Income of $100k Plus per Year.

On, your gender odds are 1.04 men/woman (or 0.96 women/man).

Updated on 2008/11/16.

Average Rating


(7 votes, average: 1.71 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

(Click a star to add your rating of!)


Item Value
Sources: View Tabs for Details
Subscription Price $35.95/Month
People 81,310 People/Month
Gender 51% Male
Age 54% 35-49 Years of Age
Household Income 32% $100k Plus per Year


Web Statistics's People/Month Graph from Compete

Metric Value
Source: Compete
People/Month 81,310 People/Month
Growth/Year -63.0%
Visits/Month 155,342 Visits/Month
Stay/Visit 09:00 Minutes/Visit
Pages/Visit 8.4 Pages/Visit



Gender Percent
Male 51% Male 51%
Female 49% Female 49%


Age Percent
Under 17 3% Under 17 3%
18-34 24% 18-34 24%
35-49 54% 35-49 54%
50+ 19% 50+ 19%


Household Income Percent
$30k or Less 18% $30k or Less 18%
$30-60k 26% $30-60k 26%
$60-100k 23% $60-100k 23%
$100k or More 32% $100k or More 32%


Ethnicity Percent
Caucasian 79% Caucasian 79%
African American 10% African American 10%
Asian 2% Asian 2%
Hispanic 7% Hispanic 7%
Other 1% Other 1%


Education Percent
No College 42% No College 42%
College 43% College 43%
Grad School 15% Grad School 15%

Children in Household Percent
Source: Quantcast
No 70% No 70%
Yes 30% Yes 30%



Item Cost
People/Dollar: Monthly People / Monthly Cost
Cost per Month $35.95/Month
People/Dollar 2,262 People/Dollar
Cost per Year $149.95/Year
People/Dollar 6,507 People/Dollar
Free Trial Yes
Limitations Communication and Search Limited

Note: Price quoted for basic subscription. Premium subscriptions cost more. Please confirm prices directly.

Website Website (Direct Link)


Compare with other dating sites by the following criteria:

Age | Education | Ethnicity | Gender | Income | Price | User Rating | Web Stats


Please share your experiences in the comments below…

Comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Comment (1)

  1. Steve wrote::

    The Good had many (seemingly) attractive profiles in my area.

    The Bad

    Paid membership was required to view most profiles so it was impossible to tell how attractive these profiles really were.

    The few profiles that were viewable had only one tiny photo and paid membership was required to see full size photo.

    More importantly, most of the profiles in my area last visited “more than” three months ago (which could mean any time, really).

    Advanced search features required upgrade to paid subscription.

    The Ugly.

    Registration required to view price list.

    The Odd

    According to demographic data from Quantcast, most visitors to were male.

    All the other wealthy dating sites had more women than men.

    For example, visitors were only 46% female compared to 69%, 59% and 54% for competing websites.

    This would lead one to believe that had more wealthy men than the other sites, right?

    Strangely, most visitors to this site had a household income of only $30-60k.

    Worth Visiting?

    Sorry, but not really. It looked like a nice site with seemingly good profiles. Unfortunately, paid subscription was required to view most of the profiles so it was impossible to get a feel for the site or its members.

    Worth Subscribing?

    No. The free trial did not give me enough information to make a purchase decision and I do not recommend joining dating sites that require registration to view their price list.

    Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 8:06 pm #
Post a Comment