Sugardaddie.com

Sugardaddie.com is a wealthy dating site visited by 155,773 people/month.

These people visit 492,882 times/month at an average of 11:06 minutes/visit.

The majority are Female, 35-49 Years Old, Caucasian with a College Education and a Household Income of $100k Plus per Year.

On Sugardaddie.com, your gender odds are 0.52 men/woman (or 1.91 women/man).

Updated on 2009/03/03.


Average Rating

Compare

(11 votes, average: 1.55 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

(Click a star to add your rating of Sugardaddie.com!)

Overview

Item Value
Sources: View Tabs for Details
Subscription Price $19.99/Month
People 155,773 People/Month
Gender 65% Female
Age 48% 35-49 Years of Age
Household Income 43% $100k Plus per Year

Compare

Web Statistics

Sugardaddie.com's People/Month Graph from Compete

Metric Value
Source: Compete
People/Month 155,773 People/Month
Growth/Year 34.5%
Visits/Month 492,882 Visits/Month
Stay/Visit 11:06 Minutes/Visit
Pages/Visit 25.7 Pages/Visit

Demographics

Compare

Gender Percent
Male 34% Male 34%
Female 65% Female 65%

Compare

Age Percent
Under 17 4% Under 17 4%
18-34 28% 18-34 28%
35-49 48% 35-49 48%
50+ 20% 50+ 20%

Compare

Household Income Percent
$30k or Less 18% $30k or Less 18%
$30-60k 21% $30-60k 21%
$60-100k 18% $60-100k 18%
$100k or More 43% $100k or More 43%

Compare

Ethnicity Percent
Caucasian 71% Caucasian 71%
African American 20% African American 20%
Asian 2% Asian 2%
Hispanic 6% Hispanic 6%
Other 2% Other 2%

Compare

Education Percent
No College 38% No College 38%
College 44% College 44%
Grad School 17% Grad School 17%

Children in Household Percent
Source: Quantcast
No 72% No 72%
Yes 28% Yes 28%

Price

Compare

Item Cost
People/Dollar: Monthly People / Monthly Cost
Cost per Month $19.99/Month
People/Dollar 7,793 People/Dollar
Cost per Year $99.99/Year
People/Dollar 18,695 People/Dollar
Free Trial Yes
Limitations Communication Limited

Note: Please confirm prices directly with dating service provider.

Website

Sugardaddie.com Website (Direct Link)
(http://sugardaddie.com/)

Compare

Compare Sugardaddie.com with other dating sites by the following criteria:

Age | Education | Ethnicity | Gender | Income | Price | User Rating | Web Stats


Share

Please share your Sugardaddie.com experiences in the comments below…

Comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Comment (1)

  1. Steve wrote::

    The Good

    Sugardaddie.com had a clean design and simple interface. It was very easy to navigate.

    Their website stated:

    “We do not have automatic renewals. You will never be billed again unless you request it.”

    This is respectable when you consider that most dating sites automatically renew paid memberships.

    Note: Some sites only mention automatic renewal in the fine print (buried somewhere in the terms of service) so read those contracts carefully!

    There was an option to turn off email notifications, which was nice (especially considering the nature of the site).

    Women outnumbered men by 2.23 to 1 in May, 2008. These are decent gender odds for the gentlemen (but not so good for the ladies).

    The Bad

    The clean, simple design is partially due to the fact that the site seemed to have very few advanced features.

    Lack of “feature creep” is generally a good thing. Unfortunately, Sugardaddie.com felt old. It may have a tough time competing against similar sites with a more robust set of features and modern interface.

    The Ugly

    Registration was required to view prices. Why would a site trying to attract wealthy men play games like that? Their subscription fees were cheaper than all of their competitors. Why waste our time by requiring registration to learn that? Hopefully Sugardaddie.com will learn that time is more valuable than money and their price point is nothing to be ashamed of.

    Worth Visiting?

    Sorry, but not for me.

    Frankly, I found much better profiles on OkCupid.com (a 100% free site).

    If you are looking for a “wealthy” dating site, MillionaireMatch.com looked like the better deal. Subjectively speaking, MillionaireMatch.com seemed to have higher quality profiles. Objectively speaking, third-party web stats in May suggested that people spent more time per visit (viewing more pages per visit) on MillionaireMatch.com than they did on this site.

    Worth Subscribing?

    No. While “no automatic renewals” was very respectable, I felt that other dating site options gave better value for my time and money. Also, I prefer not to do business with companies that require registration to view price.

    Sunday, June 22, 2008 at 1:59 pm #
Post a Comment